Nose Hair Trimmers

 Posted by Ed Briggs at 5:48 am  No Responses »
Dec 102011
 

Nose hair is on a list of things we avoid mentioning in polite society. Most people think of it as an unneeded relic of our ancestory or as a defect in the design of our bodies. Medical people may tell us that hair in the nose protects us against environmental threats such as germs, fungus, and spores. But appearance usually trumps health concerns. The celebrities whose appearance we admire and emulate do not have nose hair showing. 

I suppose you could trim nose hair by using a set of small, sharp scissors. That option is not appealing to me. I do not fancy sticking small sharp scissors up my nose and scissoring blindly. So I looked for something powered by batteries with an assurance of protection for my sensitive areas. 

An Amazon.com search on "nose hair trimmer" will return 743 buying choices as of today. I have not tried all 743. But I have tried several, and I can put them in two categories. The first is a trimmer that trims effectively but scares the heck out of you and often grabs onto things and makes you jerk. It gets the job done but you are never comfortable with the way it works. You keep saying to yourself that there must be a better way, and back you go browsing through the 743 choices.

The second type of trimmer is the opposite of the first. It is comfortable and reassuring, but unfortunately it does not trim very well. Given a lot of time and persistence you may eventually do the job with it, but the effort is frustrating. You keep saying there must be a better way. And back you go browsing through the 743 choices. This could be an endless loop.

The dilemma this illustrates is common to our society in particular and our human condition in general. Consider the following:

  • We want fast food that tastes fatty or salty or sweet, but we also want good nutrition. You can have one or the other, but not both.
     
  • We want to think of ourselves as good and generous, but we practice greed and selfishness. It doesn't work both ways.
     
  • We want good political leaders, but we don't want to be involved in the political process. Guess what?
     
  • We want the services of government, but not the obligation to pay for those services. Keep looking and good luck.
     
  • We want to be entertained by violent sports, but we don't want any players getting hurt. That isn't possible.
     
  • We want clean air to breathe and water to drink, but we don't want and regulations that restrain corporations. You can have one approach or the other, but not both.
     
  • We'd like a trim, athletic body but we hate to exercise or to restrain our appetites. How will that come out?
     
  • We don't want banks that are too big to fail, but we don't want any restraints on business. Which will it be?
     
  • We don't want politicians whose votes are for sale, but we don't support restrictions on giving them money. Go figure the outcome.
     
  • We want our children to stand on their own two feet, but we insist on making their decisions for them.
     
  • We feel guilty if we indulge ourselves, but cheated if we don't. And so it goes. And so it goes. 

In a perfect world we wouldn't have to deal with these dilemmas. But there is no perfect world. Or nose hair trimmer.

Print Friendly
Aug 142011
 

Guadalajara is the second largest city in Mexico, second only to Mexico City. It sits on a highland plateau at an altitude almost identical to that of Denver, making it Mexico's "Mile High City." As such, it is known for sunny days, cool nights, and a spring-like climate. You would think that a mile high city would be known for its clean, refreshing air. I used to think that about Denver until I learned differently. Like Denver, Guadalajara has an air pollution problem.

When I visited Guadalajara I was lucky to hire a private tour guide with his own car for a full day of looking around. I told him what I was interested in, and he took me there. He was a nice man who did accounting for the hotel and took people touring on the side. He took me places I would never have found or gone on my own, and I felt safe and comfortable being with him.

Sometime during this day, we found ourselves sitting in traffic behind a bus. When the light turned and the bus moved ahead, a cloud of thick, black, evil-smelling fumes surrounded us. My driver squirmed in his seat, made an exasperated sound, and then said to me, embarrased, that this should not be allowed in a modern city like Guadalajara. It was an awkward moment. He had just been describing the accomplishments of his city with some pride and satisfaction. And now this. I can't recall what I said, but it was probably something to the effect that the U.S. has a lot of problems with air pollution also.

Indeed, our problems with air pollution could get even worse. Efforts are underway to scale back or eliminate laws that seek to keep our air and water clean. Those laws reduce corporate profit, almost like taxes, and they should be eliminated, many claim. Even the agencies that seek to protect our environment should be eliminated, they propose. The polluters will regulate themselves, it seems to be assumed. Yeah, right. As in Guadalajara.

The need for clean air to breathe and clean water to drink is basic to the human condition. And these are in a special category of life-sustaining resources. The choices others make about their diet do not control my choices. You can eat what you want, and I can eat what I want. But air and water are shared resources. When someone pollutes them it affects us all. It isn't just the choice of the bus in front of me.

The condition of that bus affects the air I must breathe. It affects my health and well-being. It affects the futures of my children and grandchildren, and ultimately the future of our shared planet. How we would jeopardize those futures in the name of corporate greed is hard to imagine.

The planet we live on is a closed system where everything is not only shared, it is also finite. What happens to the air and water in one place affects all the other places too. It is always healthier and cheaper to keep from making a mess than to try cleaning it up afterward. The EPA has evidence that each dollar spent on pollution control results in a $30 savings in later health coasts. We can pay now or pay later, but the later costs will be be huge. 

Also, if we ignore all warnings, there could be no later later.

Print Friendly
May 272010
 

After I got my black eye, I met with the man who had given it to me.  It was the next day afterward.  I had come to his office for the meeting.  He looked at the black eye approvingly.  He made some notes about it.  Then he had me start reading from an eye chart on the wall.  I was amazed.  The eye was reading four lines better than before.  It was reading 20/20. Continue reading »

Print Friendly
© 2012 EdBriggs.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha